This video discusses a new study comparing one set versus three sets per session for muscle growth in untrained individuals, placing the findings within the broader scientific literature. It highlights the importance of understanding why studies can show seemingly conflicting results due to sample size limitations and chance, and emphasizes the value of meta-analyses for a more accurate picture. The video concludes by touching on potential regional muscle growth differences and promoting a fitness app.
New Study Findings #
- 15 untrained men trained unilateral pec deck twice weekly for 12 weeks.
- One arm performed one set per session (2 weekly sets total).
- The other arm performed three sets per session (6 weekly sets total).
- All sets were taken to concentric failure within specified rep ranges.
- Muscle thickness of clavicular and sternocostal pectoralis major heads was measured before and after.
- Both one set and three sets resulted in similar growth in both pec regions.
- The clavicular and sternocostal heads also grew similarly to each other.
- The study suggests triple the number of sets did not produce greater gains in this specific context.
Understanding Seemingly Conflicting Study Results #
- Previous research often suggests multiple sets lead to greater growth in untrained individuals.
- Apparent contradictions in studies can be misunderstood as science "flip-flopping."
- These differences are compatible with the idea that multiple sets are generally superior.
- Low set numbers can still stimulate hypertrophy, even in trained individuals, and are good for time efficiency.
- Analyzing study methods (set contrast, duration, etc.) can explain some differences.
- An alternative explanation is random chance due to small sample sizes.
- Small samples may not accurately reflect true population effects.
- Analogy of coin flips demonstrates how small samples can misrepresent reality.
- Additional sources of error in studies include limb initial size differences, outside activities, and measurement error.
- Some individuals might genuinely experience similar growth with different set numbers, but these could be exceptions.
- Simulations show that even with known true population effects, small sample studies can yield varied and seemingly contradictory results.
- Larger sample sizes help mitigate the impact of chance.
- Combining small studies in a meta-analysis increases statistical power and provides a more accurate insight into population effects.
- Single studies are just data points that contribute to future meta-analyses.
Broad Literature and Meta-Analyses on Sets and Hypertrophy #
- Meta-analyses on sets and hypertrophy exist.
- The latest meta-regression suggests more sets tend to cause more hypertrophy, with diminishing returns.
- The x-axis in the meta-regression represents weekly sets per muscle group.
- High volume is not necessarily proven to be the absolute best, and lower volumes still provide gains.
- Further videos detail optimal sets and training frequency.
Individual Differences #
- Papers suggest potential individual differences in response to different set volumes.
- One study on unilateral leg extensions and leg presses showed varied responses between one and three sets.
- However, current study designs may not definitively prove true individual differences due to limitations even in within-subject designs.
- The speaker's best guess is that individual differences exist due to physiological mechanisms and lifestyle factors (e.g., stress).
- Using average effects from the literature as a starting point is recommended.
- Training prescription can be adjusted based on individual recovery and progress.
- Experimenting with lower sets if underrecovered or additional sets if stalled can be beneficial.
Regional Pec Growth #
- The new study suggested similar growth in clavicular and sternocostal pec heads from the pec deck exercise.
- Some might expect less growth in the clavicular head with this exercise.
- Measurement was only at a single point in each region, and splitting the pec into more regions might show different results.
- This is just one study; it's not definitive proof about maximizing upper pec growth with pec deck.
- Minimal research exists on regional pec growth.
- Based on current understanding (including outside this specific study), including an exercise that potentially biases the upper pecs (like an incline press) is still recommended.
Alpha Progression App Promotion #
- Promotes the Alpha Progression app as an effective customized muscle building program.
- Highlights personalized programs based on equipment, muscle emphasis, frequency, and duration.
- Training philosophy is based on scientific literature.
- Features include workout tracking, progressive overload recommendations, workout summaries, and progression logging.
- Provides video and text instructions for over 600 exercises.
- Offers a free two-week trial and 20% off subscription using a provided link.
last updated: