Poland's journey from Soviet control to a significant economic and military power is a result of facing existential threats. George Friedman's 2009 forecast of Poland becoming a major power, initially met with skepticism, has largely materialized, driven by geographical imperatives and historical context. Their current position as a top NATO military force and an emerging G20 member reflects a determined national strategy.
Friedman's Polish Forecast from "The Next 100 Years" #
- Predicted Emergence: Friedman predicted Poland, alongside Turkey and Japan, would emerge as major powers.
- Initial Skepticism: The idea of Poland becoming a major power was initially considered laughable.
- Geopolitical Necessity: Poland's position facing Russia, unlike other European countries, necessitated its emergence as a major power due to its vulnerable, "desperately poor" situation.
- Current Status: Poland is now poised to join the G20 (the 20 largest economies) and fields the third-largest military in NATO (after the US and Turkey).
- Interconnected Growth: Military power development was contingent on significant economic growth.
- Catalyst for Action: Nations are driven to act out of desperate necessity; Poland's national stakes are much higher than countries like France.
The Role of Geography #
- Map Significance: Poland's geographical location is highly significant.
- Underestimated Russian Threat: While the probability of a Russian invasion of NATO was minimal, Poland could not assume Russian weakness.
- Impact of Ukrainian Victory: A Russian victory in Ukraine would place them directly on Poland's border, potentially encouraging further westward expansion.
- Poland's Distinct Reaction: Poland reacted very differently from other European nations, who made strong statements but lacked the imperative for military and economic buildup.
- Historical Battlefield: Poland has historically been the site of major wars over the past 200 years.
Historical Context and WWII #
- WWII Beginning: World War II began with the simultaneous invasion of Poland by Germany and Russia.
- Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact: Hitler and Stalin's non-aggression pact included the division of Poland and a pledge not to attack each other.
- Poland as a Pivot: Poland served as a pivotal territory, where control by one power threatened the other.
- Buffer Role: Historically, Poland acted as a guarantor of peace and a buffer between Russia and Western Europe/Germany.
Economic and Military Development #
- Post-Soviet Independence: Poland's economic and military growth over the past 30 years since gaining independence from the Soviet Union.
- Discipline: Growth was fueled by significant national discipline, focusing on fundamental issues due to its precarious position.
- Reclaiming Position: Soviet control severely limited Poland's development, but its post-independence growth restored it to its rightful place in Europe.
- Cold War Shift: Soviet power was once in the middle of Germany; now it's further east, creating different concerns for both Eastern and Western Europe.
- Geopolitical Imperatives: Poland's progress is a logical progression of geopolitics, driven by the imperative to become a significant military power, which required economic growth.
- Distrust of Germany: Poland also had a historic distrust of Germany, which further fueled its need for self-reliance.
Poland's Military vs. Russia #
- NATO Military Ranking: Poland possesses the third-largest military in NATO after the US and Turkey.
- Offensive Incapacity: Poland would not be a match for Russia in an offensive capacity.
- Historical Lessons: Napoleon and Hitler proved that Russia is too vast, populous, and resilient to be conquered, especially in winter.
- Defensive Capability: No rational actor studying history would attempt to invade Russia.
- Devastating Wars: While Napoleon and Hitler didn't conquer Russia, their invasions were devastating and set Russia back generations.
last updated: