Summary: The video analyzes Patagonia's brand, history, product quality (old vs. new), and environmental impact. It highlights three key strategies of founder Yvon Chouinard that contributed to Patagonia's success and discusses the perceived hypocrisy of the brand's environmental claims versus its synthetic product line. The video also features a product comparison between vintage and modern Patagonia items and an undercover visit to a Patagonia repair program.
Introduction & Creator's Effort
- Creator spent significant effort on the video:
- Third time filming due to previous issues (40-minute length, torrential downpour).
- Read two books on Patagonia.
- Acquired over $4,000 in Patagonia equipment.
- Went undercover to test an environmental program.
- Tested old vs. new Patagonia gear.
- Goal: Determine if new Patagonia gear is "not as good" as internet claims suggest.
Initial Impressions & Paradoxes of Patagonia
- Patagonia is considered a "weird brand."
- Touted as environmentally sustainable, yet its clothing is mostly synthetic.
- 65% of global clothing is synthetic, contributing to 35% of ocean pollution.
- Patagonia's flagship fleece is a major source of microplastics.
- Friend nicknamed the brand "Plastagonia."
- Perceived hypocrisy:
- 2011 "Don't Buy This Jacket" Black Friday ad led to increased sales.
- Often more expensive than competitors, even when made in the same factories.
- Founder Yvon Chouinard claimed he "never wanted to be a businessman" but became a billionaire from two businesses.
- Video will focus on three "brilliant things" Chouinard did.
- Interspersed with old vs. new gear comparisons.
- Concludes with "greatest Patagonia brag fests of all time when it comes to the environment."
Undercover Visit: Patagonia Worn Wear Program (Freeport, Maine)
- Worn Wear program offers used, cleaned, and restored Patagonia clothing with a warranty at a lower price.
- Offers free repair service for one fix per garment, any brand.
- Creator challenged the program by bringing a heavily damaged 1970s Pendleton wool flannel for repair.
Brilliant Idea #1: Make Products Five Times More Expensive Than the Competition
- Yvon Chouinard was a "pitbull" and active in outdoor sports (golden age).
- His favorite was climbing; prevailing iron pitons were single-use.
- Chouinard made reusable steel pitons that were five times more expensive but lasted longer and meant lighter loads for climbers.
- He learned blacksmithing from a library book and built his own pitons, becoming a major mountaineering gear company.
- He actively promoted his products by using them himself while climbing.
- First environmental problem: Steel pitons damaged mountains.
Sponsor Segment: Fanttik H10 Apex Hair Dryer
- Cuts drying time by 80%.
- Powered by a 110,000 RPM brushless motor.
- Quiet: 56 dB.
- Lightweight.
- Uses negative ions to reduce frizz and static.
- Built-in intelligent temperature control to minimize heat damage.
Gear Comparison (Round 1): Vintage Wool Sweater vs. Modern 50th Anniversary Rugby Sweater
- Modern rugby sweater (most expensive option purchased) did not compare favorably to vintage.
- Vintage sweater:
- 100% virgin worsted wool.
- Excellent fit.
- Better value when bought used.
- Deemed "one of the best sweaters" by the creator.
- Vintage Patagonia wins this comparison "by a mile."
- Recommendation: Buy vintage Patagonia sweaters on eBay.
Brilliant Idea #2: Identify Key Product Needs (e.g., Kapalene, Fleece)
- Chouinard noticed his cotton underwear remained wet during hikes.
- Led to the creation of Patagonia Kapalene (base layers).
- Fleece innovation:
- Patagonia reversed the fleece pile (outside) to prevent pilling and wick water more effectively.
- Added a funnel neck (makeshift scarf, neck protection from gear).
- Used bold colors for visibility (safety for climbers, marketing for casual wear).
- Improved cuffs for durability.
- Developed double-faced fleece (pill-proof, warmer, lighter).
- Patagonia rapidly adapted and discarded older designs when better technologies emerged.
- Early adoption of Gortex, fluorocarbons, DWR coatings.
- The problematic nature of synthetic materials (plastics that never go away) became clear later.
- Polyester fibers from fleece shed microplastics.
Gear Comparison (Round 2): 1988 Retro-X Fleece (Made in USA) vs. Modern Retro-X Fleece
- Vintage fleece:
- "Freaking tank": stiffer, heavier, denser, higher pile.
- Warm (overheats wearer).
- Modern fleece:
- Similar warmth to vintage in testing, but more comfortable to wear.
- Pocket has a laminate for water resistance.
- Modern version has a wind-stopping placket, vintage does not.
- Creator's initial thought: Patagonia was "cheaping out" by reducing pile height.
- Editing Michael's clarification: Reducing pile height likely for comfort or ease of wear, not cost-cutting, as polyester is cheap and shaving doesn't save significant money.
- Modern "Better Sweater" is perceived to pill easier and be less durable.
- This is linked to recycled materials:
- Recycled wool (mechanically recycled) has shorter, weaker fibers (infused with nylon for strength).
- Synthetic fibers can be mechanically or chemically recycled; chemically recycled is as strong as virgin.
- Patagonia uses both, but it's unclear which method applies to specific products.
- Synthetic clothing technology is rapidly improving (softer, denser, stronger).
- Patagonia has high testing standards.
- Verdict: Vintage Patagonia gets a point, but acknowledging improvements in synthetic tech.
Brilliant Idea #3: Authentic Marketing ("Put Hot People in Nice Poses")
- Chouinard's marketing strategy for catalogs: used authentic photos of young, fit, attractive people doing dangerous things.
- This approach was "insanely effective" and copied by competitors.
- Patagonia spends very little on marketing but uses clever tactics like:
- Worn Wear program (e.g., repairing non-Patagonia flannel generates word-of-mouth).
- "Don't buy our stuff" ads, which paradoxically boost sales.
- Chouinard's personal "notes" or manifestos.
Chouinard's "Notes" (Environmental Activism & Business Philosophy)
- First Note (for Chouinard Equipment): Addressed the damage caused by steel pitons. Introduced aluminum chalks as an alternative.
- Risky move that could have killed the business, but chalks "exploded" in popularity.
- Chouinard climbed El Capitan with chalks to prove their effectiveness.
- Second Note (for Patagonia, "Reality Check"): Acknowledged that Patagonia's clothing was not perfect, but also criticized cotton and wool.
- Recommended buying less clothing.
- However, the company did not limit growth; sales increased.
- Chouinard's contemporaries advised him to sell the company (like them) and use the wealth for his environmental beliefs. He refused.
- He doubled down on growth, aiming to be larger than LL Bean (which was 50x smaller than Patagonia today).
- Shift in global business: Brands moved to cut quality for cheaper and faster production, eliminating lifetime warranties and comprehensive customer service.
- Patagonia bucked this trend by maintaining a 1970s business structure:
- Lifetime warranties.
- Extensive repair program.
- Excellent customer service.
- High quality control.
- High prices (seen as an investment in longevity).
- Chouinard's mentality: Patagonia's size allows it to be a "giant bully to the supply chain" and force eco-friendly changes.
- Patagonia's Environmental Impact (The "Brag Fest"):
- Revolutionized organic cotton, RWS wool.
- Advanced global labor rights.
- Pioneered plastic recycling.
- Improved wetsuit insulation technology.
- Developed repair and reuse merchandise infrastructure.
- Innovated dye technology and hemp growing.
- Promoted Certified B Corporations and 1% for the Planet.
- Funded research on dangerous chemicals and microplastics.
- Example: Forcing a zipper company to eliminate PFAS, impacting the global zipper supply.
- Worn Wear program has repaired millions of items; their overall repair infrastructure's impact is unfathomable.
- Patagonia admits to past and present screw-ups regarding environmental impact but strives for constant improvement.
- The reason people love Patagonia: This combined approach to quality, environmental responsibility, and challenging industry norms.
Conclusion
- The creator leaves the viewer to decide if Patagonia is "that good."
last updated: