This video details the complex history of German reparations to Poland after World War II, examining how the issue evolved from initial agreements to later political maneuvering and the current state of affairs.
Potsdam Conference and Initial Agreements (1945) #
- No specific reparation amounts: The Potsdam Conference did not set an exact figure for German reparations.
- Soviet reparations: The Soviet Union was to receive reparations from its occupation zone in Germany, with a small portion from Western zones.
- Polish share from the USSR: Poland was to receive 15% of the Soviet reparations, as agreed in Moscow in August 1945.
- Non-monetary reparations: Reparations were mainly in the form of goods and equipment, not cash.
- Coal agreement: Moscow coerced Poland into a coal supply agreement, where Poland sold coal to the USSR at a fraction of market value.
- Coal losses: By 1956, Poland's losses from the coal agreement were estimated at over $800 million.
- Reduced Polish share: In 1947, Poland's share of reparations from Germany was reduced to 7.5%.
- Curious goods: Reparations included items like 6 million copies of Marxist-Leninist works, including Stalin's "Short Course in the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks)".
Post-Stalin Era and Polish Renunciation (1953) #
- London Agreement (1953): Western Allied countries suspended reparation payments from West Germany, prioritizing its economic recovery during the Cold War.
- East German unrest: Economic unrest in East Germany in June 1953 led Moscow to seek ways to alleviate their burden.
- Soviet renunciation of reparations from East Germany: In August 1953, the USSR renounced further reparations from East Germany.
- Polish government's unilateral renunciation: On August 23, 1953, the Polish government (led by Bolesław Bierut) issued a statement renouncing reparations from all of Germany, which went further than the Soviet-East German agreement.
- Kremlin's alleged intent: This broader renunciation by Poland is believed to have been a deliberate move by the Kremlin to further tie Poland to the Soviet sphere.
- German stance: Germany consistently cites this 1953 renunciation as legal justification against any further Polish reparation claims.
Gomulka and Gierek Eras (1956-1975) #
- Gomulka's attempts (1956-1957): Władysław Gomułka (after 1956) tried to address Poland's financial grievances with the USSR, not on reparations from Germany, but about the unfair calculation of Soviet reparations and the coal agreement.
- Soviet pressure: Khrushchev threatened to withdraw support for Poland's western border (Oder-Neisse line) if Gomułka pressed the issue too hard.
- Symbolic compensation for coal: The USSR eventually gave Poland 22 million rubles as compensation for coal losses, a fraction of the estimated $800 million.
- Border recognition by West Germany (1970): Gomułka's primary goal became West Germany's recognition of the Oder-Neisse border.
- Polish commission on reparations: A Polish commission found the 1953 renunciation catastrophic for future claims.
- No return to reparations: During the 1970 German-Polish treaty signing, Gomułka stated Poland would not revisit the reparations issue, although moral grounds existed.
- Gierek's approach: Edward Gierek's government focused on economic cooperation and seeking some form of "atonement" for WWII crimes.
- Compensation for pseudomedical experiments (1972): West Germany paid DM 100 million for victims of pseudomedical experiments, the first direct monetary compensation.
- Compensation for Polish forced laborers' pensions (1975): An agreement for DM 1.3 billion was paid into the Polish pension system for Poles who worked in Germany during the war. This money was largely absorbed by the system and did not directly reach all deserving individuals.
- German loans to Poland: Germany became Poland's largest foreign creditor by the late 1970s due to extensive loans.
German Reunification and the "2+4" Treaty (1989-1990) #
- Polish demands during reunification: With German reunification on the horizon, Poland raised the issue of reparations again, with some estimates reaching DM 200 billion.
- Helmut Kohl's strategy: German Chancellor Helmut Kohl firmly rejected these claims and successfully lobbied the US and USSR to exclude reparations from the reunification process.
- Camp David talks (1990): Kohl convinced US President George H.W. Bush that reparations would weaken a united Germany, a key US ally in Europe.
- Focus shifted to border recognition: Kohl strategically shifted the focus to confirming the Oder-Neisse border, which was a major concern for Poland.
- Poland's compromise: Prime Minister Tadeusz Mazowiecki prioritized securing the border recognition, effectively sidelining the reparations issue.
- "Two Plus Four" Treaty (1990): The final treaty on German reunification made no mention of reparations or compensation, largely due to US and Soviet disinterest in weakening Germany.
- Soviet motivations: The USSR prioritized German money to facilitate the withdrawal of its troops from East Germany, not Polish reparations claims.
Post-Reunification and the "Memory, Responsibility and Future" Foundation (1991-2006) #
- Bielecki's attempts (1991): Prime Minister Jan Krzysztof Bielecki raised the issue of compensation for Polish forced laborers during negotiations for the Polish-German Treaty of Good Neighborliness.
- Kohl's rejection of legal claims: Kohl maintained that the issue was moral, not legal, and that Germany could not afford to compensate forced laborers from 27 nations.
- Polish-German Reconciliation Foundation (1991): Germany agreed to contribute DM 500 million to this foundation for victims, a symbolic amount that caused controversy in the Polish Sejm.
- German leverage for ratification: Kohl used three incentives (visa-free travel, debt reduction, support for EU membership) and one threat (not ratifying the border treaty) to ensure Polish ratification of the good neighborliness treaty.
- US lawsuits lead to compensation (2000-2006): Civil lawsuits by American victims of forced labor against German companies triggered renewed calls for compensation.
- "Memory, Responsibility and Future" Foundation: Germany established this foundation (DM 10 billion from state and corporations) to compensate forced laborers and other victims, distributing funds until 2006.
- Polish beneficiaries: Approximately 1/5 of the funds (nearly 1 billion euros) went to Polish citizens.
- German stance on finality: Germany considers these payments, along with the 1953 renunciation and the "2+4" treaty, as finally settling all claims, both state-level and individual.
Current Discussions and Political Realism #
- PiS government's renewed demands (2017 onwards): The Polish Law and Justice (PiS) government has revived calls for reparations, citing the lack of understanding of relevant international law.
- "Reparations" vs. "Compensation": Germany will likely never agree to the term "reparations," but might consider forms of "compensation" or "atonement."
- Targeting beneficiaries: Any further compensation would most fairly go to surviving victims, whose numbers are dwindling.
- Lack of international support: Current Polish demands for reparations lack significant international backing, unlike the US-driven pressure that led to the "Memory, Responsibility and Future" Foundation.
- Future approach: The most realistic path for Poland is to focus on reminding Germany of its historical responsibility through joint cultural and scientific projects, rather than pursuing legally and politically unrealistic reparations claims.
last updated: