The video details a scientific comparison of 12 cardio exercises to determine their effectiveness for fat loss, focusing on total calorie burn, fat burn, and carbohydrate burn, also discussing the concept of "afterburn" and the importance of consistency and diet for fat loss.
Testing Cardio Workouts & Afterburn Effect #
- Jump Rope:
- Participant 1 (P1) burned 146 calories in 10 minutes; Participant 2 (P2) burned 69 calories.
- Measured afterburn: P1 an extra 28 calories, P2 an extra 8 calories after 20 minutes recovery.
- P1's heart rate reached 70% of max, not true high intensity (should be 85%+ for maximum afterburn).
- P2 found it difficult due to flat feet and coordination challenges.
- Conclusion: Not effective for P2; P1 found it tricky to raise heart rate sufficiently.
- YouTube HIIT Workout:
- P1 burned 136 calories in 10 minutes; P2 burned 100 calories.
- Measured afterburn: P1 an extra 24 calories, P2 an extra 16 calories after 20 minutes recovery.
- P1's heart rate reached 75% of max.
- P2 found it challenging but doable, changing his perception of YouTube HIIT.
- Conclusion: More intense than jump rope, but heart rate still not at true HIIT level for P1.
- Sprints:
- P1 burned 178 calories (17.8 calories/minute) in 10 minutes, the highest so far.
- P2 burned 148 calories in 10 minutes, his highest.
- Calorie source: P1 burned 97% carbs, 3% fat.
- Afterburn: P1 an extra 48 calories, P2 an extra 27 calories after 20 minutes recovery. P1's heart rate finally exceeded 85%.
- Conclusion: Highly effective for calorie burn and afterburn, but very high impact, difficult for both participants to recover from and perform regularly.
- Afterburn Discussion:
- Most exercises produce an afterburn effect.
- Comparison: Sprint afterburn (110 calories over 3 hours) vs. cycling afterburn (64 calories over 3 hours) shows a small difference (half a banana).
- Resistance training is suggested as a better choice for afterburn due to muscle maintenance and growth benefits.
Low-Impact & Accessible Cardio #
- Jogging:
- P1 burned 350 calories in 20 minutes; P2 burned 260 calories.
- Heart rate remained consistently elevated in the high range.
- P1 found it boring, and both experienced joint discomfort.
- Fasted Cardio (Jogging):
- Concept: Running on an empty stomach burns more fat because the body uses fat for energy when carb stores are low.
- Results: Similar total calorie burn as regular jogging, but a higher percentage came from fat.
- Expert opinion (Dr. Eric Helms): Fasted cardio offers no long-term fat loss benefit; total daily calorie deficit is what matters for fat loss, not calorie source during exercise.
- Conclusion: While it shifts the fuel source, it doesn't necessarily lead to more fat loss long-term. Consistency is key.
- Banded Running Shoes:
- Claimed to reduce joint impact by 80% and burn 25% more calories.
- Results: P1 and P2 burned 10% fewer calories than regular jogging, possibly due to the weight of the boots.
- P1 found it harder than regular jogging, while P2 found it easier on the knees but still challenging.
- Conclusion: Not effective for calorie burn, uncomfortable, and expensive ($300).
- Swimming:
- P1 burned 276 calories in 20 minutes; P2 burned 223 calories.
- Works nearly every major muscle group, increasing calorie burn.
- Water pulls heat from the body, leading to extra calorie burn for warmth.
- Conclusion: High calorie burn, low impact, and enjoyable for P2.
- Walking (Flat):
- P1 and P2 burned almost 200 calories each in 30 minutes at 3.2 mph.
- Benefits: Easy on joints, highly accessible.
- Fat burn: 80% of calories from fat, the highest percentage among all tested exercises.
- Expert opinion: High-intensity exercise primarily burns carbs during the session, but leads to increased fat oxidation later due to depleted carb stores. Total calorie burn remains the primary factor for fat loss.
- Long-term study: Adding 2.5 hours of walking per week (20 mins/day) led to 3.5 lbs of fat loss over 12 weeks.
- Conclusion: While not the highest calorie burner per minute, it's consistent, sustainable, and total calories add up.
- Incline Walking:
- P1 and P2 burned 50% more calories than flat walking at the same speed.
- Conclusion: More intense than regular walking but still very doable, a preferred method for boosting calorie burn.
- Walking with Weighted Backpack:
- P1 burned 13% more calories; P2 burned 30% more (due to relative weight).
- Conclusion: Can boost calorie burn, but can cause back strain.
Summary & Recommendations #
- Calorie Measurement Accuracy: Personal trackers (Apple Watch, cardio machines) can be inaccurate (off by 10-30%) compared to metabolic masks.
- Fat Loss Principles:
- Calorie Deficit is Key: Total daily calorie balance determines fat loss, not just the fat burned during a workout.
- Metabolic Adaptation: As you lose weight, your body burns fewer calories, necessitating adjustments in diet or activity level.
- Resistance Training: Crucial for maintaining and building muscle during fat loss, which helps maintain metabolism and improve physique.
- Best vs. Worst Cardio (Personal Rankings):
- P2's Best: Swimming (high ROI, enjoyable, low impact).
- P2's Worst: Sprints (highest calorie burn per minute, but not realistic for consistency due to recovery demands).
- P1's Best: Regular walking (consistency, ease of integration into daily life). Close second: Stairmaster.
- P1's Worst: Sprints (high calorie, but highly taxing and difficult to recover from).
- Consistency over Intensity: The exercise you can consistently perform is more effective for long-term fat loss than a highly intense workout you do rarely due to recovery issues.
- Diet is Paramount: Cardio alone is insufficient for fat loss; neglecting diet can easily negate workout benefits. Combining cardio with a calorie-controlled diet and resistance training is the most effective approach.
- Built With Science+ App: Promoted as a tool to automate diet and workout guesswork, offering personalized adjustments.
last updated: