Summary #
This video critiques Duolingo's recent shift towards AI, arguing it has led to a decline in product quality and alienated users, despite current financial success. It also discusses Duolingo's historical business model of unpaid user labor and its engagement-focused design, which prioritizes app usage over genuine language learning.
The Downfall of Duolingo #
- Duolingo's mascot, Duo, was initially a beloved cultural icon, but the company's recent AI focus has turned public opinion against them.
- Users are reporting a decline in lesson quality, problematic features, and a general shift in brand "vibes."
- Many dedicated users are deleting their accounts, citing betrayal despite years of use.
The Rise of Duolingo: A History of Unpaid Labor #
- Founder Luis von Ahn previously created CAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA, which used unpaid human labor to train AI.
- Duolingo's initial business model involved users unknowingly performing translation services for paying companies, essentially unpaid labor for language learning.
- Early attempts to monetize were not successful.
Monetization and the AI Shift #
- Duolingo introduced ads in 2015, followed by premium subscriptions (Duolingo Plus in 2017, Super Duolingo in 2022, Duolingo Max in 2023).
- Duolingo Max ($30/month) specifically introduced AI features like "explain my answer" and "role play."
- These pricing tiers increased revenue but deviated from the mission of free language education.
Growth Strategy and Duo's Role #
- Duolingo's growth was driven by its gamified approach and the interactive nature of Duo the Owl, who would "scold" users for not maintaining streaks.
- The company's TikTok presence, led by Zarya Parvez, further boosted its popularity through "trendjacking" and engaging content.
- This strategy resulted in significant user growth and revenue.
The AI Controversy #
- Following the Duolingo Max rollout, the company replaced 10% of lesson writing contractors with AI.
- Users reported numerous errors in AI-generated content (misgendering, nonsensical sentences, culturally insensitive responses).
- Duolingo shut down its community forums in 2022, which previously allowed users to report errors and crowdsource help.
- A "Duo the Owl is dead" marketing stunt in February backfired, with users finding it disingenuous.
- The CEO, Luis von Ahn, declared Duolingo an "AI-first company," leading to further backlash from employees and users, despite a later partial retraction.
Duolingo's Effectiveness as a Language Learning Tool #
- Critics argue Duolingo is not designed to truly teach a language, but rather to create the feeling of learning.
- Many educators and linguists state Duolingo is effective for vocabulary and memorization, but not for conversational fluency or understanding cultural nuances.
- Even the founder admits the app can only get users to an intermediate level.
- The app's gamified nature (XP, leaderboards, streaks) prioritizes engagement over deep learning, akin to a "Steam library" of unplayed games.
- The current AI-generated errors further diminish its credibility as a learning tool.
Financial Success Amidst Criticism #
- Despite user backlash and declining product quality, Duolingo's stock is at an all-time high.
- Daily active users, paid subscriptions, and revenue have all seen significant year-over-year growth.
- The company is spending more on R&D, sales, and marketing, suggesting that the AI talk about cost-cutting might not be accurate in terms of overall spending.
Conclusion #
- The video questions whether Duolingo, with its wrong lessons and engagement-driven model, truly functions as an educational platform.
- It argues that Duolingo is in the business of "engagement," aiming to keep users interacting with ads and premium subscriptions rather than fostering genuine language acquisition.
- The company's deviation from its original mission of accessible education risks eroding its "social trust," a crucial asset based on word-of-mouth growth.
last updated: